University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NDIAYE Edriss G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 3 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 5 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 5 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% |
| 7 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% |
| 8 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 9 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | CHO Jadon Yushin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 11 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% |
| 13 | PAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 30% | 5% |
| 14 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 15 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 20% | 2% |
| 16 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 17 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 18 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 19 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 21 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 22 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 23 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 24 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | ZEIN ELABEDIN Tamer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 31 | WOOD Alexander W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 32 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | - |
| 35 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | JAN Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 37 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
| 39 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 40 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 2% |
| 40 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 83% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 77% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 44 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 93% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | DIAZ Julio P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 46 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 4% |
| 47 | PRUT Anton | 100% | 99% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | GODIN Willis | 100% | 88% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 49 | METZ Mason | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 51 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | RADU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% |
| 53 | VILLANUEVA Daniel | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | GRIEB Oliver | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 57 | SHEA William | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 58 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 97% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | MATZ Cameron | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | GORDON Jacob | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 63 | RHEE Josiah | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | RHUDE Jacob | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | THAN Duc | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 66 | STANSBURY Desmond | 100% | 40% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 67 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 100% | 75% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | CRANE William | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | BEREKNYEI Lukas | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | NELKA Brenden | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.