Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARRIER Meredith | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 2 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 3 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 5 | YUNG Bethany | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 6 | LIN Ariel | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 7 | LEE Camilla | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 8 | HE Anna | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 9 | WANG Victoria | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 10 | SUN Karolyn | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 11 | WU Jessica | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 12 | WONG Sydney | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 13 | CHEN Julia Z. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 15 | BUCA Nora | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 16 | PACHECO Carys | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 17 | KUTSY Olga | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | LIN Isabel | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% | |
| 19 | MANDAP Alessandra | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | KANE Chloe | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
| 22 | KIM Vivian | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LIN Laura | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | XU Amy(Chenyu) | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | |
| 26 | GAGARING Genia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 27 | BURICEA Ada | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
| 28 | MENDOZA zoie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 29 | LEE Yeriel | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 30 | DWIGGINS Reese | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | CIOBANU Celine | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 37% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CHEONG Chloe | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 34 | BLANCO Ariia | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 37 | SUN Hanya | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
| 38 | ZHAO Emma | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | JAQUISH Zoey | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | ZHU Riley | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 41 | BUDMAN Ava | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | WANG Lihong | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 43 | MOHAN Riya | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | LEE Kaitlyn | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | HAN Sydney | 2% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GAN Shelby | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 47 | YUEN Elsie | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 48 | DENEALE Lucia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | ZHAO Yanning | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 50 | LEE Adelynn | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 52 | KOU Cynthia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | LE Luana | 12% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | SHERMAN Olivia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | STEPHAN Ella Whitney | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | LI Carlie | 8% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | BLAETZ Isadora | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 58 | LU Chloe | 7% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | HERD Angela | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 60 | RADOV Una | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | YIP Allison | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LUCENA Yaretzi | 19% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | GRAZIANO Ruby Mae | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 66 | BEATINGO Chelli | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 67 | GRAZIANO Josephine | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | BREWER Isis | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 70 | UEMURA Lyllia | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 71 | ZU Jacqueline | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | TESLENKO Ekaterina | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 73 | ABDALLAH Maryem | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 74 | CHAE Avery | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.