Fortune SYC/RJCC & Y8

Y-12 Men's Saber

Sunday, March 30, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LUC Cedric - - - - 6% 31% 63%
2 GREENSTEIN Viktor - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
3 WONG Hawken - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 GRIGORIEV Roman - - - - 5% 29% 66%
5 KANG Jeremy - - - 4% 29% 66%
6 KIM Suin - - 1% 12% 48% 39%
7 YUEN Caleb - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 23%
8 OU Rigel - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
9 VO Blake - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
10 LI Ryan - - 1% 7% 26% 41% 25%
11 TANG Morgan - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
12 HAO Johnny - - 3% 18% 42% 36%
13 SLOAN Ethan 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4%
14 WANG David - - 2% 15% 49% 34%
15 LEE Jayden 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% -
16 CHUNG Evan - 2% 9% 27% 37% 22% 3%
17 FU BRANDEN - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
18 YUE Ivan - 2% 16% 41% 34% 8%
19 DESAI Arthav - 5% 22% 42% 28% 4%
20 CHEUNG Evan 3% 19% 39% 29% 9% 1%
21 TABANCAY Cole - 3% 18% 39% 32% 7%
22 LIN Ethan - 3% 14% 32% 33% 15% 3%
23 LAI Mars - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 10%
24 LEE Brendan - - 3% 17% 38% 35% 7%
25 DING Orlando 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
26 RAZAI Evan - 1% 7% 29% 43% 20%
27 HRISTOV Nickolas - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
28 PARK Jayden - 2% 15% 38% 36% 9%
29 KIM Leo 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
30 CHOI LIAM - 4% 17% 37% 33% 9%
32 HO Alden - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 3%
33 GUO Jonathan - 5% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
34 QI Zach - 2% 14% 36% 34% 12% 1%
35 HAN Kyle 1% 6% 20% 34% 29% 11% 1%
35 LVOVSKIY Roman - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
37 LEE Kyle 1% 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
38 VENKATRAMAN Sushil - - 5% 21% 40% 28% 6%
39 KIM Derek 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% - -
40 CHEN Aaron - 1% 11% 36% 40% 12%
41 QI Jeremy 1% 9% 31% 40% 17% 2%
42 JI Derek 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% -
43 WU Allen 9% 32% 39% 18% 2% -
44 YOON Jacob 5% 25% 42% 23% 5% -
45 DUFF Michael 2% 16% 36% 33% 12% 1%
46 SU Eric - 3% 17% 40% 33% 8%
47 LOPEZ Mateo 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
48 FAN Yuchen - 4% 22% 40% 27% 7% 1%
49 YUAN Alan - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
50 RHODES Bryce 15% 39% 33% 11% 2% - -
51 LIU Paul 3% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2% -
52 LUO Gavin - - 3% 19% 39% 31% 7%
53 DENG Richard - 4% 21% 42% 28% 4%
54 LI Sky 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
55 RAMBHIA Smit - 2% 15% 35% 34% 12% 1%
56 TAN Daniel 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
57 HSIEH Sebastian 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
58 SAHA Aadi 25% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
59 YANG Aegon 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
60 WANG James - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
61 曾 ZIMO - - 4% 17% 38% 33% 8%
62 ZHOU Ruibo 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
63 DUBIN Jake 22% 47% 25% 5% - - -
64 MALLARD Arthur 6% 27% 40% 23% 3% -
65 SAHA Aryan 1% 14% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
66 YE Aaron - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 3%
66 BODO John 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
68 LEI Isaac 13% 36% 34% 14% 2% -
69 ZHU yinxi 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
70 IRVINE Cooper 4% 23% 40% 25% 7% 1% -
71 GRENIER Tristan 3% 21% 42% 26% 6% -
72 LOVELL Jackson 8% 31% 39% 19% 2% -
73 ZHANG Connery 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
74 CHEN Donovan 16% 41% 32% 9% 1% -
75 WANG Henrik - 6% 24% 40% 25% 5%
76 ELSAYED Omar 2% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3% -
77 ADAMS Jordan 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% -
78 LEE Bill King - 4% 17% 33% 32% 13% 1%
79 NG Jaden 53% 37% 9% 1% - -
80 SUN Alan 17% 44% 31% 8% 1% -
81 RAMAKRISHNA Arjun 6% 28% 41% 21% 4% -
82 STERN Kazuki 43% 43% 13% 1% - -
82 FENG Daniel 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
84 XIN Ryan 24% 48% 24% 4% - -
85 LIU Franklin 29% 44% 22% 5% - -
86 WU Kaiden 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
87 JASPERSON Nolan 14% 41% 33% 10% 1% - -
88 WU Dustin 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% - -
89 HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A 7% 34% 39% 17% 3% -
90 ZHAO Ivan 33% 46% 19% 3% - -
91 BOURCIER Rowan 36% 43% 17% 3% - - -
91 XU Logan < 1% 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
93 DING Kyen 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% -
93 WEI Jonathan 18% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
93 PILYAVSKY Daniel 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
93 PALOMBO Gabriel 41% 44% 13% 2% - - -
97 LIN Rongcheng Noah 23% 43% 27% 7% - -
98 LEE Ryan 20% 42% 29% 9% 1% - -
99 ROHRBACH Flynn 25% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.