Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
2 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
3 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
3 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
5 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
6 | KIM Suin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | |
7 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
8 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% | |
9 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
10 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
11 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
12 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
13 | SLOAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
14 | WANG David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 34% | |
15 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | - |
16 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
17 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
18 | YUE Ivan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% | |
19 | DESAI Arthav | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% | |
20 | CHEUNG Evan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
22 | LIN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
23 | LAI Mars | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
24 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 7% |
25 | DING Orlando | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | RAZAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
27 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
28 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% | |
29 | KIM Leo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
30 | CHOI LIAM | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
32 | HO Alden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
33 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
34 | QI Zach | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
35 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
35 | LVOVSKIY Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
37 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
38 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
39 | KIM Derek | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
40 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% | |
41 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
42 | JI Derek | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
43 | WU Allen | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
44 | YOON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | |
45 | DUFF Michael | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
46 | SU Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
47 | LOPEZ Mateo | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
48 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
49 | YUAN Alan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
50 | RHODES Bryce | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
51 | LIU Paul | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
52 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
53 | DENG Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 4% | |
54 | LI Sky | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
55 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
56 | TAN Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | HSIEH Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
58 | SAHA Aadi | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | YANG Aegon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
60 | WANG James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
61 | 曾 ZIMO | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
62 | ZHOU Ruibo | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
63 | DUBIN Jake | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
64 | MALLARD Arthur | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
65 | SAHA Aryan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
66 | YE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
66 | BODO John | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
69 | ZHU yinxi | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
70 | IRVINE Cooper | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
71 | GRENIER Tristan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - | |
72 | LOVELL Jackson | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
73 | ZHANG Connery | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
74 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
75 | WANG Henrik | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
76 | ELSAYED Omar | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 3% | - |
77 | ADAMS Jordan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
78 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
79 | NG Jaden | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
80 | SUN Alan | 100% | 83% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
81 | RAMAKRISHNA Arjun | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
82 | STERN Kazuki | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
82 | FENG Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
84 | XIN Ryan | 100% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
85 | LIU Franklin | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
86 | WU Kaiden | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
87 | JASPERSON Nolan | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
88 | WU Dustin | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
89 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
90 | ZHAO Ivan | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
91 | BOURCIER Rowan | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
91 | XU Logan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
93 | DING Kyen | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
93 | WEI Jonathan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
93 | PILYAVSKY Daniel | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
93 | PALOMBO Gabriel | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
97 | LIN Rongcheng Noah | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
98 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
99 | ROHRBACH Flynn | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.