Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 2 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% | |
| 5 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 6 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | |
| 7 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 8 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 9 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 10 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% | |
| 12 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 13 | LU Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 14 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 15 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
| 16 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 18 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 19 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | MUENKE Magnus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 21 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 22 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | LIU Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 25 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 27 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | WANG Devin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 1% | |
| 29 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 30 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 31 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 32 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 33 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | HERBRANDSON Luke | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 36 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 19% | |
| 37 | KIM Remington | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 40 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 41 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 43 | GREENMAN Duke | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | REICHMANN Theo | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 45 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 46 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 47 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 48 | DOSHAY Noah | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | WANG Jason | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 50 | SUROV Alexander | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | XUE Michael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 52 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | WANG Dylan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | GUO Luke | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DENG Destin | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | NIKIFOROV Timofei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 57 | LIU Max | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 59 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% | |
| 60 | MA Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 61 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 62 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHANG jinghao | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | KOU Mason | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | CHEONG Cameron | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 66 | QIN Owen | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | FU Nolan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 68 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | PORIKLI Sedat | 100% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 73 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | SU Samuel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 75 | DENG Henry | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 76 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | TAMAYO-SARVER Daniel | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | LI Sean | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 81 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 81 | FEI Victor | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 83 | STRONG Justin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | FU Adrian | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 85 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | YU Brandon | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 88 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | SARMIENTO Luke | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 92 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 93 | SAYAL Ryan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.