University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
| 2 | DAVIDOVA Kira | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 3 | KOLMYKOVA Aleksandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 3 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 5 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 6 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 7 | CHANG Norah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | HUA Catherine W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 9 | YUCEL Emine I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 10 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 11 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 89% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 12 | BERNARD Kathryn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 14 | TENG Christine Renmei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
| 17 | BARROSO Isabela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 18 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 19 | JOHNSON Laura S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 20 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 2% |
| 21 | WEINSTEIN Hannah | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | KIM Grace | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | WANG Erica | 100% | 83% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | SIERRA Kate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
| 28 | MCAFEE Jada | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 30 | BARBORIAK Emily | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | NADKARNI Marisa | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 32 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 33 | ARRI Gaia | 100% | 76% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | NGUYEN Anna | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HIRSCH Lauren | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | PERRY Madelyn | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 39 | VANNIER Anouk | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MARTIN Audrey | 100% | 37% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.