Irving, TX - Irving, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 2 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
| 3 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% |
| 6 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 7 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 9 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 12 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
| 14 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% | |
| 15 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 19 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | CHEN Jaden K. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 22 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | OH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 25 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 26 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 28 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 29 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | STRINGFELLOW Cameron C. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 18% |
| 36 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | BARRETT Austin | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | ANDRIC Borna | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | WANG Rui Qin | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | OH Joshua | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 47 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | HOLLIS Lance | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | VEDRE-KYANAM KABIR BAIG Aaradhya | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | SALMAN Hamzah | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Brian | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | SALERNO Griffin | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.