Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | TUCKER ALFONSO Javier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 2 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 3 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 3 | SEIKEL Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 16% | |
| 5 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
| 6 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% |
| 7 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
| 8 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CONLEY Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | 7% | |
| 10 | CATELLIER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 9% |
| 11 | KARASICK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 13 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 15 | HUTZ Michael B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 16 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | |
| 18 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | BJERKNESS Riley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 22 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | TAN Theodore | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 27 | ATOS Christian | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | FAN Yonghua | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | DEXTER Danny | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.