Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 2 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 5 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
| 6 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 7 | LU Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 8 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% |
| 10 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 11 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 18% |
| 12 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 13 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 14 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 15 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 16 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 17 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 18 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
| 19 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 20 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 21 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% |
| 22 | CHEN Nuo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% |
| 23 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 23 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
| 25 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | 2% |
| 26 | LIU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 5% |
| 27 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 10% |
| 28 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 29 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 24% |
| 30 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | HUANG Holmes (Shengheng) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 32 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 34 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
| 35 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 36 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% |
| 37 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
| 38 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 39 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 40 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 10% |
| 41 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 14% | |
| 43 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 44 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | - |
| 45 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 45 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
| 48 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 49 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 50 | SALEH Ali | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 52 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 4% |
| 53 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 5% |
| 54 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 2% |
| 55 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 56 | YANG David H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 58 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 59 | WANG Luke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 60 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 10% |
| 61 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 62 | CAO Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 63 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 2% |
| 64 | BU Ethan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 67 | LI Jayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 68 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 69 | BEYDOUN Sam | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 69 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 71 | JABLOKOV Roman | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Julian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 73 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 21% | 1% |
| 74 | CHENG Karter | 100% | 98% | 72% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 75 | HU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | - |
| 76 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 77 | HU Michael | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 78 | XU Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 79 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 80 | HUANG Anthony | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
| 81 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 82 | LIN John | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SU Aiden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 83 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 86 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 87 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 88 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 98% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 89 | SINCAVAGE Louis | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 91 | XU Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 92 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 93 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | WU David | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 95 | HUANG Dikang | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 97 | SHAW eric | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 98 | ZHAO David | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 101 | KWON Chase | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 102 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 102 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | - |
| 104 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 105 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 106 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | JUVVADI Pratham | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 108 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | TANG Michael | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 110 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 111 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 113 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 97% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 115 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 116 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 117 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 118 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 119 | CHEN Kyler | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 120 | KIM Ewan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 121 | MURDOCK Koichi | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 121 | WANG Jaaziel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 123 | LIN George | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 125 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 126 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 126 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 128 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 129 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 130 | MORALES Tycho | 100% | 96% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 131 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 132 | JIANG Bohan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 132 | KUBBA Krish | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 132 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 132 | KIM Albert | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 136 | ROTH Adam | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 137 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 138 | NAYAK Saideep | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 139 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 140 | SUN Nathan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 141 | RAJAT Rivaan | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 141 | BRADY David | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | - |
| 143 | PRICE Ezra | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 143 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 145 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 146 | TAN Allen | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 147 | MAN Dylan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 148 | WU Max | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 149 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | ZHAO Ethan | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 150 | LI Eric | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 150 | KOO Jaeha | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 153 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.