Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Mendy | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 2 | KIM Daniel | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 36% | |
| 3 | SONG Enoch | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 3 | CAO Joshua | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 5 | CZARNECKI Thomas | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 6 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 7 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 8 | YANG Luca | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 9 | GUGALA Frank | - | - | 5% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 10 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 11 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 12 | CHOI Hunter | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 14 | LIN Ziyue | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
| 15 | SHEN Lucas | - | 6% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
| 16 | XIA Vincent | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | MOON Nolan | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | ZHANG Vincent J | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 22% | |
| 20 | CHEN Kevin | 20% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | XU ETHAN | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | SUN Andrew | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | FREL Vincent | - | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 24 | KUPERBERG Thomas | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | LI Andrew | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 27 | SU Sean | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 28 | DAVIDSON Henry | 1% | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | YOON Mason | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | YANG Crescent | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | WU David | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | JUVVADI Pratham | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MONDESIR Chace | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | DEVISETTY Sohun | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 35 | DEGRYSE Leopold | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WU Connor | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | IM Andrew | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | MAN Dylan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | MACKENZIE Dylan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SNYDER Winston | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 41 | NAYAK Saideep | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | LEONG Michael | 1% | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 43 | PELLERIN Liam | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | BRADY David | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | ALABI Adriel | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 46 | BUBNIS Declan | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MCLENDON Mateo | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | COHEN Benjamin | - | < 1% | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
| 49 | WILSON Henry | 12% | 49% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | YEUNG rex | 38% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | PARISH-MORRIS Jay | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | WEBSTER Rowan | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 53 | ZHAO Ethan | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CASTILLO Hector | - | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 7% |
| 55 | MAGUIRE Edward | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 56 | LEE Ryan | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MCCORMICK Chase | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | OLINO Patrick | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 59 | AIRAN-JAVIA Shiv | 1% | 22% | 47% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | GALLAGHER Thomas | 19% | 49% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | ZEI Julian | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 63 | LEUNG-AINSLEY Edward | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LEE Thomas | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 65 | FRANKEL Matthew | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | LEE Andrew | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.