Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAKANI Aditi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 2 | LEE Eden | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | HAN Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 3 | RAJPUT Mahek | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% | |
| 5 | YOON Cora | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | ||
| 6 | JU Jennifer | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% | |
| 7 | SIU Mila | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Flora | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 9 | XIE ANDREA | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 10 | KOUAME Candice | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 11 | CHEN Reina | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | FURMAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 13 | CHEN Laila | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 14 | BOUTSIKARIS Asha | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | KIM Abigail | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% | |
| 16 | ZHAO Rachel | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | LUO MAOSHUEN | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | HOWARD Katherine | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 19% | ||
| 19 | LI Juliana | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | ||
| 20 | PATEL Agena | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | YIN Elaine | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
| 22 | FEESER Alexia | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 23 | PATEL Aria | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | ||
| 24 | YOUNG Penelope | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LIU Brinley | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 26 | SAJJA Anwita | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | WANG Katherine | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KUO Stella | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Anna | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | OZALP Tara | 9% | 43% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ERATA Selena | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | SUN Sarah | 12% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MISHIMA Quinn | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | ABDALLAH Lily | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Emma | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 36 | LOUGH Abbie | 55% | 37% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | YU sage | 3% | 22% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | KAUR Harjas | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 39 | SELASSIE Semara | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | HUGHES Mackenzie | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | KOGAN Maya | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | BONDE Trisha | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | ZHU Kaylee | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.