Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAKANI Aditi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 2 | LEE Eden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
| 3 | HAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | RAJPUT Mahek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% | |
| 5 | YOON Cora | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | ||
| 6 | JU Jennifer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | |
| 7 | SIU Mila | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Flora | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | XIE ANDREA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 10 | KOUAME Candice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 11 | CHEN Reina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 12 | FURMAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 13 | CHEN Laila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 14 | BOUTSIKARIS Asha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | KIM Abigail | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 3% | |
| 16 | ZHAO Rachel | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | LUO MAOSHUEN | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | HOWARD Katherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | ||
| 19 | LI Juliana | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | ||
| 20 | PATEL Agena | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | YIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 3% | |
| 22 | FEESER Alexia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 23 | PATEL Aria | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | ||
| 24 | YOUNG Penelope | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LIU Brinley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 26 | SAJJA Anwita | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | WANG Katherine | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KUO Stella | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Anna | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | OZALP Tara | 100% | 91% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ERATA Selena | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | SUN Sarah | 100% | 88% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MISHIMA Quinn | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | ABDALLAH Lily | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHANG Emma | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 36 | LOUGH Abbie | 100% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | YU sage | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | KAUR Harjas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 39 | SELASSIE Semara | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | HUGHES Mackenzie | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | KOGAN Maya | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | BONDE Trisha | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | ZHU Kaylee | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.