Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 2 | TUCKER ALFONSO Javier | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 6 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
| 7 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% | |
| 8 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 10 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | YANG Gary | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 13 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 15 | ZHOU alex | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | GARCIA-CABRERA Jeffrey | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | LI Jade | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 18 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | |
| 19 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 20 | DE LA CRUZ Jean Carlos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 20% |
| 21 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 22 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 24 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
| 26 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 27 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 30 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 33 | PAN Colin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 1% |
| 34 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 36 | ASGARALLY Anthony | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 38 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 89% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 47 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 13% | |
| 48 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 49 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | MONTAGUE Braeden A. | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 77% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN YiHeng | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 55 | NGUYEN Trung | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 56 | DALTON Matthew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 57 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.