Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
2 | WONG Baron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
3 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
3 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
5 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
6 | HERBRANDSON Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
7 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 10% |
8 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
9 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
10 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
11 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
12 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
13 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% | 1% |
14 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
15 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
16 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
17 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
18 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
19 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
20 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
21 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
22 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
23 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
24 | SUROV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | - |
25 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
26 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | |
27 | SARMIENTO Luke | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
28 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
29 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
30 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 1% |
31 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
32 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | DOSHAY Noah | 100% | 93% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | NORTON Henry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 7% | |
37 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
38 | GRAHAM Jacob | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
39 | DENG Destin | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | KIM Remington | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | - |
41 | WANG Dylan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
42 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
43 | LI Zerong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
44 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
45 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
45 | PEAKE Santiago | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
47 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
48 | FEI Victor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
49 | MA Ciel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | ROLAND Nikolas | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
51 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
52 | PORIKLI Sedat | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | KOU Mason | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
54 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
55 | GONZÁLEZ Jesús | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
56 | LI Sean | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
57 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
58 | HOBBS Fineas | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
59 | TERRA BARRETT Isaiah | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.