Academy of Fencing Masters - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LUCENAY Jean Michel | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | YAMASAKI Kyle | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | D D V V D | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
3 | LI Yunji (Rain) | V V V D V D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
5 | KHAYAT Ziad | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | ALVAREZ Ian | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
7 | WU Steven | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | CHEW Aedan | D V D V V | V V V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
9 | HEDGES Philip | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
10 | ZHENG Haoran | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
11 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
12 | COHEN Benjamin | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | TANG Mingyuan | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | SOULAIRE Tom | D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
15 | JAIN Samyak | V D V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
16 | PERALTA Christian | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
17 | GALLAGHER PELLETIER Samuel | V V V V V V | V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
17 | LI Ethan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
19 | HEPLER Sarah | V V V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 6 | +3.6 |
20 | YU Austin | V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
21 | ELLOWAY William | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
22 | MCLAREN Mason | V V D V V | V D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
23 | LAI Amanda | V V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
24 | NICHOLSON Dimitri | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | CHANG Andrew | V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
26 | KOFMAN David | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
27 | ELZAYN Hadi | V D V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
28 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | V V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
29 | WONG Preston | V D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
30 | ONG Jee Ken | V V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
31 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
32 | GACIOCH Noah | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
33 | CHEN Bailey | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
34 | WYATT Seth | D V V V V D | D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
35 | WANG Jessie | V D V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
36 | ROCK Matt | D V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
37 | WANG Devin | V V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
38 | FUNG Shaun | D V V D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
39 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | V D D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
40 | SIM Ian | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
41 | MENG QINGTAO | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
42 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | V V D D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
43 | XU Jessica | D D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | TONG Samuel | V V D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
45 | QIAO James | D V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
45 | HANSEN Kira | D D V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
47 | XU Celina | V V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
48 | HSU Joshua | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
49 | MOLLINIER Angel | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
50 | GANESH Maxen | V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
51 | KIM Ian | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
52 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
53 | MEINHOLD Li | D D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
54 | YOUNG Quentin | V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
55 | RUFANOV Maxim | D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
56 | LOUIE Joseph | V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
57 | WICKBOLDT Eric | V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
57 | LIN Isabel | D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
59 | XIE HanZhang | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | SALISTRA Emilia | V D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
61 | SIRBU Dan | D V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
61 | HAMILTON Travis | V D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
63 | LIU Max | V D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
64 | FICKLIN Ryan | D D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
65 | WHEELER Mark | D V V V D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
66 | JARIN-LIPSCHITZ Laura | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
67 | GUO Woody | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
68 | SIU Phoeland | D D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
69 | DILEEP Roshan | V D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
70 | SU Samuel | D V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
71 | CHANG Heidi | V D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
72 | POPOVICI Alina | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
73 | HEDGES Lucas | D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
74 | KOUTSOUKOS James | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
75 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
76 | LI Sean | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
77 | JAQUISH Zoey | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
78 | SCHOR Elisabeth | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | ZHANG Luqi | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
80 | CHI Kai-Hung | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | ZHONG Louie | D D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
82 | BECK Brian | D D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
82 | BALUCAN Caelus | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
84 | OR Anson | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
85 | TEJADA-ANDERSON Emmanuel | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
86 | LI Grayson | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
87 | HOFMAN Haejung | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
88 | LIU Yichen | D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
89 | SMITH Marissa | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
89 | CLARKE Elliot | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
91 | CHIEM Karen | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
91 | NAZARENKO Olena | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.