Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GERACI Paul A. | V V V V V V | V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | MAI Carl D. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | BUTTA Reese | V V D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 8 | MILLER Hayden | V V D D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | STOCK Olivia | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 10 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | V D V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | MACNEIL Matthew | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | PLUMMER Ken | D V D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 14 | MILLER Brent | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 15 | FULLER II Thomas | V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 16 | MACNEIL Sydney | D V D D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 17 | MYERS Lewis | V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 18 | DAVIS Daniel L. | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 19 | MCNARY Ross | V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 20 | FAENOVA Alexandra | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 21 | STAUBITZ Marc | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 22 | AGRAWAL Krishna | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 23 | BUTTA Robert | D D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 24 | HARKNESS Luke | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 25 | DUTTON Kimberly | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.