Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 2 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | - | 6% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
| 5 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 18% | |
| 6 | MAI Carl D. | - | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | BUTTA Reese | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 8 | MILLER Hayden | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 9 | STOCK Olivia | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | |
| 10 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 12 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 13 | PLUMMER Ken | 6% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 14 | MILLER Brent | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 15 | FULLER II Thomas | - | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | MACNEIL Sydney | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | MYERS Lewis | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 18 | DAVIS Daniel L. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | MCNARY Ross | 4% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | STAUBITZ Marc | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | AGRAWAL Krishna | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 23 | BUTTA Robert | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | HARKNESS Luke | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | DUTTON Kimberly | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.