San Diego Jewish Academy - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | SMITH Dylan H. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
3 | SMITH Justin C. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | DILLON Anik | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
5 | ROMANO Ren | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
6 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
7 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
8 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
9 | WILKENS Zach Q. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
10 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
11 | ZAROTSKY Ronald | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | ALLEN David | V V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | THOMAS Michael | D V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
14 | KOUTSOUKOS James | V V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
15 | CLAWSON Brian C. | D D V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
16 | OLIVAS Joseph | D D D D D | V V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
17 | CHAO Warren | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
18 | CLARK Ethan J. | V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
19 | LABOVITCH David | V V V D D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
20 | KURITZ Marc M. | V V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
21 | THISTLETHWAITE Doug W. | V D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | BAILEY Creston P. | D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
23 | HAU Pak-Kei | D D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
24 | LUNDE Drew | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
25 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | D V D D V V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
26 | LIANG Donny | D D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
27 | DU Yiwei | V D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
28 | KNIGHT Alex | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
29 | DE LAUNEY Merric | D D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
30 | LIANG Dong | D D D D D V | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
31 | ROBSON Sam | D D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
32 | CHIEN William | D V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
33 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | V D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
34 | HEWITT Frank F. | D V D V D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
35 | HORN Evans | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
36 | FERRIERE Thomas | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
37 | NUGENT Curtis | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
38 | BONTHA Dhruv | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
39 | PICKETT Alexander | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
40 | XUE Chenming | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
41 | WANG Lawrence | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.