Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% |
| 2 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 31% |
| 3 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 3 | WEISS Miles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% |
| 5 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
| 6 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
| 7 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | STEVENSON Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | - |
| 9 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 10 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 3% | - |
| 11 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% |
| 12 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 13 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
| 14 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 17% |
| 15 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 16 | KABA Elias | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% |
| 19 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 55% |
| 21 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 21 | SONG Changze | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 23 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 6% | - |
| 24 | QUIRK Dylan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | WANG Zichun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 28 | MEN Junda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 29 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 98% | 77% | 31% | 3% | - |
| 30 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 8% |
| 31 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 3% |
| 32 | GU Eric | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 34 | WILSON Ian G. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 35 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
| 36 | O'BRIEN Eamon | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | - |
| 37 | LI Ray | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 6% | - |
| 39 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 41 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 45 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 3% |
| 46 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | ZELIN Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | - |
| 48 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 51 | WANG Zhenhai | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 51 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 84% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
| 53 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 55 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | MURRAY John P. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LU Eric | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | NGUYEN Trung | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.