NEUSFA 2025 Pomme De Terre

Senior Men's Foil

Sunday, June 15, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KAO Castor T. - - - - - 10% 90%
2 CHEN Kyle P. - - - 3% 33% 62% 2%
3 OURSLER Jack - - - 1% 25% 74%
3 CHENG Ethan - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
5 HASSAN Mohamed H. - - - - - 4% 96%
6 LIN Michael - - - 2% 23% 75%
7 WANG Rory - 1% 6% 24% 40% 24% 5%
8 KNIZHNIK David - - - 6% 51% 42%
9 XU Andy P. - - 4% 17% 37% 33% 9%
10 TRAUGOT Owen G. - - - 1% 13% 48% 38%
11 DESANDO Michael R. - - - 1% 13% 51% 35%
12 SIMA Congyu Josh - - 4% 24% 46% 26%
13 YAO Bradley - - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
14 STANLEY Mason B. - - - - 6% 38% 56%
15 AHN Jun - - 3% 20% 47% 30%
16 LI Arvin - - 1% 8% 34% 42% 15%
17 LIU Derek - - - 3% 21% 45% 31%
18 TAHOUN Mostafa - - 1% 14% 66% 18%
19 LI Bradley - - 3% 19% 47% 31%
20 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - - - 2% 16% 49% 33%
21 JIANG Owen - - - 5% 24% 44% 26%
22 SIMONOV Timofey - - 2% 13% 42% 40% 2%
23 LI Aaron - - 1% 11% 31% 39% 18%
24 KONG Luculentus X. - 2% 15% 41% 34% 8%
25 MARTIN Darius - 1% 10% 35% 47% 8%
26 LIN James G. - - - 1% 10% 47% 43%
27 TAN Aidan - - 4% 27% 43% 22% 4%
28 FOGELSON Frederick J. - - - 3% 20% 46% 31%
29 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) - - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7%
30 TEMPLE Jackson - - - 5% 26% 45% 23%
31 SONG Noel - - 4% 25% 46% 25%
32 LEE Jonah - - 1% 15% 59% 24% -
33 DEEB Adam - - 7% 37% 40% 14% 2%
34 BAI Austin 6% 30% 43% 19% 1% < 1%
35 TANG Albert - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 20%
36 CHENG Logan - 1% 8% 29% 39% 20% 3%
37 DOBBINS Evan W. - - 1% 9% 41% 49%
38 JACOVINO Jonathan S. - 3% 23% 45% 25% 3%
39 TANG Terry - 2% 15% 43% 33% 6% -
40 WU Brian - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5%
41 AKYAMAC Bora - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
42 JIN Andy 5% 26% 40% 23% 5% - -
43 ZOBEL Eric H. - - - 3% 21% 55% 22%
44 TAM Kyle 2% 14% 37% 35% 10% 1% -
44 POPESCU Tudor - 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
46 DESOLA Aidan J. - - 1% 10% 36% 40% 13%
47 CHO Xzander - 6% 30% 45% 17% 2% -
48 ZAIDI Adil - 6% 30% 38% 20% 5% -
49 SURESH Rohan - 5% 30% 44% 19% 2% -
50 GONG Benjamin - - 5% 29% 48% 18%
51 ZHAO Brian 10% 36% 38% 14% 2% -
52 ABRAMKIN Tim 3% 20% 41% 29% 6% -
53 DJONOUMA Toyohm 1% 12% 41% 40% 5% -
54 XU Ethan - - 5% 24% 47% 23% 1%
55 BAI Brian - 1% 11% 38% 39% 10% 1%
56 YEVDAYEV Tamir 4% 23% 41% 26% 6% - -
57 FENG Michael - - 6% 29% 49% 15% 1%
58 SFINTESCU Alex 8% 52% 33% 7% - - -
59 XU Dinghui Ryan 3% 23% 47% 23% 4% - -
60 FORTES PINA Adrian 17% 45% 30% 7% 1% - -
61 SULLIVAN Jackson R. - - < 1% 6% 48% 46%
62 GATES Combustion 27% 44% 24% 5% - -
63 SENANI Arjun 3% 23% 46% 24% 4% -
64 YANG Dylan - 7% 37% 38% 15% 3% -
65 JABLOKOV Roman 13% 45% 33% 8% 1% - -
66 VO Jonathan 17% 47% 30% 6% - -
67 KUO Phineas 16% 43% 32% 8% - -
68 SABATINO Patrick 41% 44% 13% 1% - -
69 SOLOPOULOS James 32% 45% 20% 3% - -
70 DENG Kenny 38% 43% 16% 2% - -
71 AMEND Jake 44% 42% 13% 2% - - -
72 LOZADA Gabriel G. 2% 19% 54% 22% 3% - -
73 ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. - 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 4%
74 TORO Alejandro - - < 1% 3% 17% 43% 37%
75 MOO Gareth G. 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
76 ZHAO Brandon - 12% 44% 35% 8% 1% -
77 CHUA Kirby 2% 16% 37% 34% 10% 1% -
78 AYYAGARI Abhiram 21% 43% 29% 7% - - -
79 OH Joshua 12% 38% 37% 11% 1% - -
80 RIPA Joseph K. 5% 27% 41% 23% 4% - -
81 LAO Kevin 2% 14% 38% 39% 7% - -
82 BUCOURT Vincent 23% 49% 24% 4% - - -
83 PETINO Leonardo 15% 45% 31% 8% 1% - -
83 HARRIS Noah 7% 31% 40% 19% 3% - -
85 GOODMAN Elliott 48% 41% 10% 1% - -
85 LEE Charles T 2% 16% 39% 34% 9% -
87 LIGH Thomas 8% 33% 40% 17% 2% -
88 SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad 4% 25% 46% 21% 4% -
88 YANG David H. 26% 50% 22% 3% - -
90 BERETICH Brian 40% 45% 13% 1% - -
91 LEE Thomas 11% 38% 37% 13% 2% - -
92 XU Brian 5% 51% 34% 9% 1% - -
93 WOHLERS Trevor 3% 23% 45% 25% 4% - -
94 ZHANG GAVIN J 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 2% -
95 MCENTEE Owen 19% 43% 30% 7% - - -
96 LI Ayren - 6% 24% 39% 24% 6% 1%
96 SHAMBARGER Graham 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
98 HOWARD Fox 24% 52% 21% 3% - - -
99 FEINBERG James Y. 44% 47% 9% - - - -
100 BELL Guillaume 81% 18% 1% - - - -
101 DAVIDSON Elliot 1% 8% 30% 42% 17% 2%
102 DAUM Charlie < 1% - 6% 28% 47% 17% 2%
103 REARDON Patrick M. 20% 44% 28% 7% 1% -
103 KROLEWSKI Alexander 22% 48% 25% 4% - -
105 XU Ryan 35% 52% 12% 1% - - -
106 WU Michael 2% 18% 42% 34% 4% -
107 WILBERT Matt 3% 24% 47% 25% 2% -
108 REELS Eric J. 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% - -
108 HU Daniel 45% 44% 10% 1% - - -
110 STOKES CARDENTE Isaiah 46% 43% 10% 1% - - -
111 ANDERSON Maxwell 87% 12% - - - - -
112 WENGER Caleb 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
112 POBLACION REZENDE Theodoro 55% 37% 7% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.