Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SPRINGER Michael | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 2 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 3 | PRIHODKO Andrew | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 3 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
| 5 | BELLIVEAU Shane | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 5% | |
| 6 | FOLEY Kevin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 35% | |
| 7 | CHU Brandon A. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 8 | WALTING Paul J. | - | 5% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 9 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 10 | KAIN Brad | 2% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 11 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 12 | SANTOS Felipe | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | CAFASSO Martin | - | - | 7% | 32% | 45% | 16% | |
| 14 | BUSH Thomas | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 15 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
| 16 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 17 | WARD Carrington R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 18 | EBER Daniel | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 19 | GERSEN Jacob | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 33% | 4% | |
| 20 | TYSON Julian F. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 21 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 22 | WHITELOCK James R. | 6% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | BERLET Bobby F. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 38% | 9% | |
| 25 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | LIU Kun | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | RUGGLES William R. | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | MELCHER Charles | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | SAMBROOK Roger C. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 30 | PARTE Aidan | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | HU Jansen T. | - | 5% | 33% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | BENNETT Paul | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MILES Ronald D. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | CUFF Joe | 52% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | TARDIFF Seth | 30% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | HIGGINS Paul | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | OTTAVIANO Marcus | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LONADIER Robert | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | DAVIS Robert | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | HANNA Richard | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | BUISINE Sebastien | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | COHEN David A. | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.