Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
2 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
3 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
3 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
5 | BELLIVEAU Shane | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 5% | |
6 | FOLEY Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
7 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
8 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
9 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
10 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 7% | - | |
11 | DEPOMMIER Remi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
12 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | CAFASSO Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 16% | |
14 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% | |
15 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
16 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
17 | WARD Carrington R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | - |
18 | EBER Daniel | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | - | |
19 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 4% | |
20 | TYSON Julian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
21 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 1% | |
22 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
23 | BERLET Bobby F. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 9% | |
25 | CULLER Michael (Mike) D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
26 | LIU Kun | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
27 | RUGGLES William R. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | - | |
28 | MELCHER Charles | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
29 | SAMBROOK Roger C. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
31 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 19% | 2% | |
32 | BENNETT Paul | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MILES Ronald D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 2% |
34 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
35 | CUFF Joe | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | |
36 | TARDIFF Seth | 100% | 70% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | HIGGINS Paul | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
38 | OTTAVIANO Marcus | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
40 | DAVIS Robert | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
41 | HANNA Richard | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | BUISINE Sebastien | 100% | 87% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
43 | COHEN David A. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.