Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHEN Leonardo | D D D V D | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 2 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | WICAS Graham E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | PETERS Nathan M. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | SERAFIN Ben | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | WU Matthew | V V V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
| 7 | KOEPPEL Levi E. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 8 | RVACHEV Michael | V D D V D D | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 9 | TATE William Isom | V V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
| 10 | SVERDLOV Seth | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | ANAFI Ari | D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 12 | SHREM Samuel G. | V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 13 | RIM Eugene | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 14 | LIOU Solomon | D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 15 | WU Michelle | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 16 | LIN Qianzhong | D V V D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 17 | ZHAO Kuncheng | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | ANDERSON Riley | V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 19 | HU Robert J. | V V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | KRISHNAN Skanda | V V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | CHEN Allen | D V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | LIU Adam | D V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 23 | MATTO Edward J. | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | BASSINDER Jake | V D V D D V | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 25 | SHAFAIE Ali | D V D D V V | D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 26 | BUACHIE Aaron | V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | EVANS Joseph | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | CHOI Paul S. | V D V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 29 | LI Morgan | D D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | V D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 31 | COETZEE Frans M. | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | MARRAN John | D D D D V | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | WU Jerry | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | CHEN Raymond | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 35 | WU Pingchien | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | LIU Kun | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 37 | LEE Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 38 | SHABALIN Nikita | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 39 | PONDACO Frankee | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.