Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 2 | VEDRE Neil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 9% |
| 3 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 6 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 7 | WOLMART Zander | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 9 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 10 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | LEVY Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 12 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 13 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | HELD Lev | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | JARAMILLO Juan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 16 | GUPTA Arav | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 18 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 19 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 21 | ORIE Sohan | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 23 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 24 | ABDELLAHI Aziz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 25 | ZONG Yujie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 26 | BHASKAR Dhananjay K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 27 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 28 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 29 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
| 30 | MARTINEZ Luke | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | LEE Damian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | JAIDEVA Aakash | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | JAGANNATHAN Ajay | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 35 | CONG Mason | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LABRADOR RODRIGUEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | COBITZ Harrison | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 38 | DZIALO George A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 39 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MCCAFFREY Timothy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 44 | KRAYTMAN Matthew | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SOMANI Aarav | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MERCURE Edward (Tony) | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 51 | ZHANG David | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KOCKELMAN Zeno | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | MUKHERJEE Aryan | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | BERGHAUSER Zachary | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BARAKAT Bailey | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.