Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 10% |
2 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
3 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
3 | ZHOU Chenqiao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
5 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
6 | CHALUT Etienne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
7 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
8 | LEE Jaden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
9 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
10 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
11 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
12 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
13 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% |
14 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
15 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
16 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
17 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
18 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
19 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 7% | |
20 | COSTE Fabien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 13% |
21 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
22 | YI William W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
23 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
24 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
25 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
26 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% |
27 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
28 | YANG Charles | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% |
30 | PE Noah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
33 | NAVARRO Kato | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
34 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
35 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
36 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
37 | SUMIN Yang | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
39 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | |
40 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
41 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
42 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
43 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
44 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
45 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
46 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
47 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
48 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
49 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
50 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
51 | LI Daniel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
52 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
53 | PARK William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
54 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
54 | CAJERO Luis O. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
56 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% | |
57 | ROZALSKI Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
58 | LEPAROUX Jean | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
59 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | LI Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - |
62 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 100% | 67% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
64 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
65 | BI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
66 | AGARWAL Savya | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
67 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
68 | SEIGEL Duncan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
69 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
70 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
71 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
72 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
73 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
74 | CHOI Colin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
75 | FOY Grant | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
75 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
77 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
78 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
79 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
80 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | XU Ryan | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
82 | GUO Joey | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
83 | BURLINGAME Owen | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
84 | KARPMAN Benny | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | WEI Winston | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
86 | POUND Michael | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
87 | LI Jake | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
88 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
89 | YEE Colin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
90 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
91 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
92 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
93 | ZIEGLER Everisto | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.