Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
2 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
3 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
3 | CAMAMA Tessa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
5 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
6 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
7 | LI Xiaoyun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
8 | WU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
9 | MAI Mailan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
10 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
11 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
12 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
13 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
14 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
15 | HERNASA Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
16 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
17 | XU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
18 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
19 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
20 | WANG Chantal | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
22 | KROTZ Gemma | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
23 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 9% | |
24 | FU Shannon | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
27 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
28 | SHETTY Nandita | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
29 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
30 | HARRISON Amelia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% |
31 | JIN Zhengtian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
32 | GAN Shelby | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - | |
33 | CHEN Weiting | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
34 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
35 | LIN Isabel | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | LEE Yeriel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
37 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
38 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
39 | AIRES Julia | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
40 | LEREE Fernanda | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | BURICEA Ada | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
42 | CHEONG Chloe | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
43 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
44 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
44 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
46 | CHEN Julia Z. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
47 | MAENG Gloria | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
48 | KUTSY Olga | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
49 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
50 | FREEMAN Katherine | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | RADOV Una | 100% | 75% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
52 | GUESNARD Maelig | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
53 | HALUSHKO Liliia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
54 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
55 | BUCA Nora | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 6% | 1% | |
56 | MENG Fina | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
57 | RALSTON Katherine | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
58 | KANE Chloe | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
59 | THOMSON Sarah | 100% | 74% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
60 | BROWN Riley | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
61 | BLASKO Judit | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | CHAN Allison M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
63 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
64 | XU Hua | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.