Main Hall Dallas Market Center - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KROPP Wesley | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
2 | TANG Daniel | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
3 | DING Max | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
3 | WU MiEr | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
5 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
6 | YAO Ryan | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
7 | YAO Aiden | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
8 | LEE Leo | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
9 | WONG Kyle | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
10 | GALBRAITH Carson | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
11 | LIU Austin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
12 | BELETSKII Ivan | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
13 | ZHANG Aiden | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
14 | ROBERTS Arthur | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
15 | CHIANG William | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
16 | CHEN Hayden | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
17 | YUE Bryan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% | |
18 | LI Andy | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
19 | LIN Bryan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
19 | MAXWELL Taiga | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
21 | FEELY Samuel | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | CHEN Linus | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
23 | RODRIGUEZ Emiliano | 2% | 10% | 25% | 31% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
24 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 4% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | ZHANG Chaoyi(Joey) | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
26 | CAREY John | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | RAU Shogun | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
28 | HUA Nolan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
29 | THOMSON Piers | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
30 | HOLDEN Harrison | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
31 | CHEN Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
32 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | CHEN Aiden | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
34 | LEE Taeryum | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
35 | WU James | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
36 | JIANG Adam | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
37 | DESAI Adithya | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | GEVA Reuben | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
39 | GARIKIPATI Tharan | - | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 5% |
40 | PARK Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
41 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
42 | SHIM Jaeyoo | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
43 | TAN Samuel | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | VAN RIET Matteo | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
45 | LAI Jayden | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
46 | SATHYAN Dhruv | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
47 | YOU Asher | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
48 | MODI Vihaan | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
49 | CHA Aiden | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
50 | JENKINS James | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
51 | YIN Zizhan | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
52 | DUDDA Kavin | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
53 | KIM Ian | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | LIU YULIN | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
55 | KHALID Ilyas | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
55 | XIONG Alec | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
55 | KAPP Eamon | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | MONTGOMERY Jaxon | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | EFIMOV Georgii | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | HUANG EVAN | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | CURTISS Cameron | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | OLELE Chibuikem | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
63 | ALI Akash | 10% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | CANONACO Maddox | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | LEE Daniel | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
66 | SALAKO Declan | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
67 | QU ethan | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.