Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
| 3 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 3 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 5 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% |
| 6 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 7 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 8 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 94% | 64% | 19% | 2% | ||
| 9 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 3% |
| 10 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 11 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 14 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 21% | ||
| 15 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 51% | ||
| 16 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 18 | LI Ray | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 19 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 20 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 21 | SPALDING Elihu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 23 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 1% |
| 24 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 25 | BYRON Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 27 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 29 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WANG Eason | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MARTISEK Martin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 34 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 35 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 36 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 1% |
| 38 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% | |
| 39 | PUTHOFF Henry | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | MOZZER Nolan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 44 | ASHLEY Logan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 45 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 46 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 49 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 50 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 51 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | CHAVES Evan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
| 56 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 57 | SONPAL Winslow | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | GU Eric | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 59 | ZHU Brady | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SMALL Brayden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 62 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | LIU George | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MOSHIER Calvin | 100% | 68% | 21% | 2% | - | ||
| 67 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | HOLCOMB Liam | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | RUDIGER George | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 70 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BEAULIEU Edmund | 100% | 74% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | ||
| 73 | KLOTS Theo | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LIU Easun | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.