Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KO Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | HOU Gaven | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 50% | 17% |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 3 | GATES Combustion | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 5 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 30% |
| 6 | QU Richard | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 7 | ZHAI Derrick | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 42% |
| 8 | LI Jayden | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 9 | CHANG Parker | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 40% | 34% |
| 10 | JIN Andy | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 11 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 12 | OH Joshua | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | ZHENG Austin | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 14 | HU Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 15 | SUSANTO William | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
| 16 | HU Weijie | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | BRILLANTES Luke | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 18 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 19 | HAN Jiaren | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | KEEGAN Cole | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | TIAN Dylan | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | LU Hansen | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Alexander | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | SUN Nathan | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | QIAN Zekai | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% | |
| 26 | ZHAO David | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | ULYSSE Jacob | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | JABLOKOV Roman | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 29 | LI Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | SONG Enoch | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | HUYNH Kaleb | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | ROPER Griffin | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | WANG Luke | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | SHARMA Ari | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | REN Ryan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 37 | WANG Joshua | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | DAWSON Myer | 4% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | TIAN Andy | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 40 | DAVE Neil | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 42 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | CHEN Kevin | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | DENG Jonathan | 1% | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 45 | BRADY David | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | JANAITIS Anderson | 11% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | SUN Andrew | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHENG Vincent | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIU Kunshuo | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | WOODWORTH Desmond | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | WONG Maxwell | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | GOLI Arush | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | MCCORMICK Chase | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 27% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | PELLERIN Liam | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SNYDER Winston | 6% | 36% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | LIU Brady | 5% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CUI Ryan | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 59 | KOEFERL Miles | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | CASSIE Charlie | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 61 | XIA Vincent | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 62 | CHEN Yichao | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 64 | DUAN Desmond | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | BHOSREKAR Som | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | XU Jaden | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 67 | LIU KELVIN | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | PU Jonathan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.