Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
2 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 17% |
3 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
3 | GATES Combustion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
5 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% |
6 | QU Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
7 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% |
8 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
9 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
10 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
11 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
12 | OH Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
13 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
14 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
15 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | |
16 | HU Weijie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
17 | BRILLANTES Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
18 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
19 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
20 | KEEGAN Cole | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
21 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
22 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
23 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
24 | SUN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
25 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 17% | |
26 | ZHAO David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
28 | JABLOKOV Roman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
29 | LI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
30 | SONG Enoch | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
31 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
32 | HUYNH Kaleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
33 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
34 | WANG Luke | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
35 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
36 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
37 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
38 | DAWSON Myer | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
40 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
41 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% | |
42 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
43 | CHEN Kevin | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | DENG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
45 | BRADY David | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | JANAITIS Anderson | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
47 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
48 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | LIU Kunshuo | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
50 | WOODWORTH Desmond | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | WONG Maxwell | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
52 | GOLI Arush | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
53 | MCCORMICK Chase | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
54 | CHAE Thomas Woojin | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
55 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | SNYDER Winston | 100% | 94% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
57 | LIU Brady | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | CUI Ryan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
59 | KOEFERL Miles | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
60 | CASSIE Charlie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
61 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
62 | CHEN Yichao | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
63 | KROLEWSKI Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
64 | DUAN Desmond | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
65 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
66 | XU Jaden | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
67 | LIU KELVIN | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
68 | PU Jonathan | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.