John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 2 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 3 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 35% |
| 5 | GRIGGS Kaiden | 100% | 98% | 77% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 6 | TANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 7 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | KELLY Blair | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 12 | CASH William Li | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 29% |
| 14 | BOHLER-PARK Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 15 | ALPSOY Emir | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | PARK Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% | ||
| 18 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 19 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | QUEENER, IV Henry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | ||
| 22 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | ||
| 23 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 25 | JONES Gideon | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | HAM Ian | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | MAXWELL Taiga | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | CHUNG Daehyun Daniel | 100% | 85% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | ||
| 31 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KUBBA Sauvil | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | ||
| 33 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | NOBLE Reed | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SERGEANT Henry | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | LI Nolan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUK Kwon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | FEELY Samuel | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SANTANGELO Jack | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | MCGAHAN Cashton | 100% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Lucas Yun Xiang | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.