Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
| 2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | WANG justin | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 3 | LIU Adam | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 5 | HU Robert J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 6 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 73% |
| 7 | MEHROTRA Neel | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 8 | WANG Tony | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | SANTOS Francisco M. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 10 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 12 | TRAN Spencer | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
| 13 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 4% |
| 14 | SONG Troy | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 15 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 2% |
| 16 | SUH Aiden | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 17 | DURKIN Hudson | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Eason | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | < 1% | |
| 20 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 21 | CHEN Luowen | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 22 | BRADSHAW Carter | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 23 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 26 | GLUSHKOV David | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 28 | XIE Brandon | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 48% | 17% | |
| 29 | YIN Chujun | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | CAFASSO Alexander | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CHEN Tianjun | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NUTOVYCH David | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 33 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | CUELLAR Markus | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DANIELS Jonah | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 36 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 37 | KELLEY Hayden | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 38 | FEINBERG James Y. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | BYRON Max | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 40 | WANG-SONG Evan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 41 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 42 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | WHITE Aidan | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Jonathan | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GU Eric | 14% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | PAN Anthony | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | SONPAL Winslow | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LI Ray | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BAJAJ Nakul | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | KAPLAN Maddox | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | PETERSEN Zachary | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 52 | CHAN Tyler | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HANNA Alexander | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | PETINO Leonardo | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHENG Jason | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | THOMAS Ethan | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | DU Yifan | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | MAGLOTHIN Atticus | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | ROBINSON Garrett | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | MITSCH Aubrey | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | LEE Harrison | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.