Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
| 2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 3 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 35% |
| 3 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 5 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 6 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 7 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 8 | WANG Tony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 9 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 10 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 11 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 12 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 13 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 4% |
| 14 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 15 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 17 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Eason | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | < 1% | |
| 20 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 21 | CHEN Luowen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 22 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 13% |
| 23 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
| 26 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 11% |
| 28 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 17% | |
| 29 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NUTOVYCH David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | - |
| 33 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 34 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DANIELS Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 36 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 37 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 38 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | BYRON Max | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 42 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 43 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | GU Eric | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 47 | SONPAL Winslow | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LI Ray | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 52 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | THOMAS Ethan | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | DU Yifan | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | MAGLOTHIN Atticus | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | ROBINSON Garrett | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | MITSCH Aubrey | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.