Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Mendy | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 2 | ZHAI Derrick | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SONG Enoch | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | WU Wallace | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 5 | QU Richard | V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 6 | HU Michael | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | ROPER Griffin | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | ZHANG Eric | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | HUYNH Matthew | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 10 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | ZHAO David | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | HUYNH Kaleb | V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | XIA Vincent | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | TIAN Andy | V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | ZHONG Kingsley | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | WU Yulen | V V D V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | BRADY David | V V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 18 | HAN Jiaren | D V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | SHARMA Ari | V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 21 | LI Andrew | V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ZHENG Vincent | D V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | XIONG Jeffrey | D V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | PELLERIN Liam | V D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | DAVE Neil | V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | CHEN Keegan | D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 27 | XIA Wenhao | D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | GENG Vincent | V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | LU Ethan | D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | TARDIFF Owen | V D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | DENG Jonathan | D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LIU KUNDE | D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | WANG Grant | D V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | LIU Brady | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 35 | LI Ethan | D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | CRIUCOV Daniel | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | BHOSREKAR Som | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | HU Hudson | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | LIU KELVIN | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 41 | YANG Mark | D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | CUI Jason | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 43 | SAVIR Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 44 | RENSHAW Hunter | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.