Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Mendy | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | ||
2 | ZHAI Derrick | - | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 72% |
3 | SONG Enoch | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 28% | |
3 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% | |
5 | QU Richard | - | - | 3% | 31% | 65% | ||
6 | HU Michael | - | - | 2% | 18% | 47% | 33% | |
7 | ROPER Griffin | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
8 | ZHANG Eric | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 38% | 3% | |
9 | HUYNH Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
10 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 51% | 11% |
11 | ZHAO David | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
12 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | 3% | 26% | 56% | 16% | ||
13 | XIA Vincent | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
14 | TIAN Andy | 2% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 8% | ||
15 | ZHONG Kingsley | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
16 | WU Yulen | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | BRADY David | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 12% | - | |
18 | HAN Jiaren | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
20 | SHARMA Ari | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | ||
21 | LI Andrew | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
22 | ZHENG Vincent | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
23 | XIONG Jeffrey | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | - |
24 | PELLERIN Liam | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
25 | DAVE Neil | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
26 | CHEN Keegan | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | ||
27 | XIA Wenhao | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
28 | GENG Vincent | 2% | 21% | 53% | 22% | 2% | ||
29 | LU Ethan | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
30 | TARDIFF Owen | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | DENG Jonathan | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | ||
32 | LIU KUNDE | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
33 | WANG Grant | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
34 | LIU Brady | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
35 | LI Ethan | 42% | 48% | 9% | - | - | ||
36 | CRIUCOV Daniel | 39% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | BHOSREKAR Som | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
38 | HU Hudson | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | LIU KELVIN | 22% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | YANG Mark | 33% | 50% | 16% | 1% | - | ||
42 | CUI Jason | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | SAVIR Ethan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | RENSHAW Hunter | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.