Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Madeline | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | CHEN Laila | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 3 | HAN Emma | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 3 | VILLER Alice | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 5 | FURMAN Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 6 | BOUTSIKARIS Asha | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | GOFMAN Anastasia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 47% | 19% |
| 8 | CHEN Reina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 8% |
| 9 | MOKRETSOV Leah | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 10 | SIU Mila | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 9% |
| 11 | YIN Elaine | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | KIM Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | ZHANG Yuchen A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 14 | SHEN Sophia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 15 | PATEL Agena | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | TANG Jacquelyn | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | YUSHCHENKO Ivanka | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | LI Juliana | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | ERATA Selena | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 20 | PATEL Aria | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | BERENSHTEYN Gabriella | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CHOI Noah | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LEE Zoe | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | MISHIMA Quinn | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DOROSHKEVICH Maria | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | QIN Olivia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | BONDE Trisha | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | WANG Katherine | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Emily | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KAUR Harjas | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GRECO Athena | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WILLIAMS Valentina | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHAO Rachel | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | GORDON Winter | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | LOUGH Abigail | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | KUO Stella | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | LEE Zerah | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | WU Caroline | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SALIBA Madison | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MAO Faith | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 41 | VILLER Gabriella | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHOI Serine | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.