Factory 220 - Passaic, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
2 | KO Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
3 | QIAN Zekai | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
3 | SAMUEL Lucas | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
5 | ZHAO Ryan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% |
6 | CHOI Hunter | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
7 | BAS Jonathan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
8 | ZHENG Austin | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
9 | KIM Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
10 | LIN Joshua | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | < 1% |
11 | KAYE Ben | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
12 | ROPER Griffin | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
13 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
14 | CAO Joshua | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
15 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
16 | GLICKSBERG Alexander | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
17 | HU Michael | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
18 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
19 | SHEN Lucas | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
20 | XIA Vincent | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
21 | GUGALA Frank | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
22 | SONG Enoch | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 45% | 9% | |
23 | DAVIDSON Henry | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | |
24 | REN Ryan | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
25 | YANG Luca | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
26 | SHAW eric | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
27 | KIM Albert | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
28 | LEE Aeden | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
29 | CHENG Karter | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
30 | MORRIS Micah | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
31 | ZHANG Ethan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
32 | LEVKOVICH Avery | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
33 | WU David | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | TARCHICHI Daniel | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | IM Andrew | 12% | 43% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
36 | PARISH-MORRIS Jay | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | XU Jonathan | 9% | 41% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
38 | CHEN Kevin | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
39 | KOO Jaeha | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
40 | RAJAT Rivaan | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
41 | LEE Ryan | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | BRADY David | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | MCCORMICK Chase | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | SINGH Arihaan | 1% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | - | |
46 | PRICE Ezra | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.