French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BUELAU Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 47% |
2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
3 | LASIYCHUK Nikita | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
3 | STANGE Jakob | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
5 | LI Jesse | - | - | 2% | 18% | 52% | 28% | |
6 | RIGGINS Joshua | - | - | 2% | 38% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
7 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | - | - | - | 7% | 39% | 42% | 12% |
8 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 17% |
9 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 9% |
10 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
11 | KULCSAR Viktor | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
12 | HUTTO Joshua | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
13 | NDJEKA Jesse | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
14 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
15 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 23% | 3% | |
16 | GREGER Jack | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
17 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
18 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | - | - | 10% | 44% | 46% | |
19 | MARSHALL John W. | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 44% | 12% |
20 | ZENG Zihan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 2% |
21 | REDEMANN Shawn | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | ELLIS, IV Floyd | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
23 | SCOTT Alex | 21% | 47% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
24 | FORTUNA Chase | 2% | 30% | 62% | 7% | - | - | - |
25 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% |
27 | JONES Reilly | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
28 | WANG Kaiyan | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | IGNATIK Piotr | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
30 | LINDOW Connor | - | 5% | 30% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
31 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
32 | SEABLOOM Jack | 30% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | CHU Duong | 10% | 38% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
34 | QASHOU Mohammad | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | EVERT Todd | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
36 | RAKOTOZAFY Adrian | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
37 | ZHANG James | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 2% | 18% | 50% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
39 | MASSIE Jay Thomas | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | BRANG David J. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
42 | GILL Anhad | 13% | 61% | 25% | - | - | - | - |
43 | YORK AJ | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | TERRILL Luke | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
45 | MCNARY Sean | 33% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
46 | MCNARY Ross | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
47 | ADAMS Christopher | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.