San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
2 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
3 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
3 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
5 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
6 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
7 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
8 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
9 | SHA Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
10 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
11 | WU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
12 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 16% | |
13 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
14 | YU Austin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
15 | WANG William | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
18 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
19 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
20 | BUEHLMANN Johann | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
21 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | |
22 | VINODH Matsya | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
23 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | WANG Robert | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
26 | BLOSSOM Jackson | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.