Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIKHONOV Ilia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 2 | TIKHONOV Daniel | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% | |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
| 6 | CLICK Tristan | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 7 | SU Caleb | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | ||
| 8 | HAN Sam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 9 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 27% | ||
| 10 | MODANLOU Navid | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 11 | WANG Marcus | 1% | 19% | 46% | 28% | 5% | ||
| 12 | AYOTTE James | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
| 13 | LEECH Braedan | - | 7% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | LIU Yueri | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 15 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 6% | |
| 16 | ALI Farhan | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 17 | ADDYSON Aidan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | LEE Anton | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 19 | DILDA Griffin | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | LEE DoWon | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | CHENH Justin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 22 | ZHU Yiming | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
| 24 | ROBERTS Phoenix | - | 8% | 36% | 53% | 3% | ||
| 25 | PENG Yue | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | |
| 26 | KONG Brandon | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | - | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | YANG Gary | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | ||
| 31 | BENUCCI Vincent | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | KIM Daniel | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | KIM Joshua | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 34 | NOLAN Tyler | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 35 | YI Nathan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 36 | GATEWOOD Michael | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | RAMEY Daylon | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | SAAD Noah | 15% | 45% | 34% | 6% | - | ||
| 39 | PETROVSKI Kiril | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | DELONG Joshua | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | CHO Alex | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | YU Jason | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | BROSNAN Solomon | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Max | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 46 | SZIEDE Kieran | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 47 | TATE William Isom | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 48 | FEELY Benjamin | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | CUTHBERTSON Dax | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | PAL Ian K. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | CHANEY Charles | 1% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | DAVIS Kai | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | BAYUS Oliver | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LORENZ Nathan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | KONG Ethan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | THORN Evan | 17% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | RICHMOND Ozan | 7% | 45% | 37% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 60 | WU Jiachen | 25% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | SAAD Peter | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 62 | HALE Bradley | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | CHAN Ian | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 63 | DAVIS Jack | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | ZENG Felix | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 66 | MCCABE Kian | 7% | 36% | 45% | 12% | - | ||
| 66 | PERI Mourya | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | BANG Dylan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | CHONG Eden | 55% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | SACKETT Gavin | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.