Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GU Andrew | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 2 | YUEN Caleb | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 3 | DUFF Michael | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 30% | |
| 3 | ERPELDING Ryan | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 5 | PI Edwin | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 6 | LEE Kyle | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
| 7 | SU Eric | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
| 8 | WANG Henrik | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 9 | LEE Jayden Junhyuk | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 10 | WANG James | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 11 | WANG Darren | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | RAZAI Evan | - | 1% | 8% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
| 13 | CHEN Aaron | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 14 | LOPEZ Mateo | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | LAI Mars | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 16 | PARK Jayden | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 17 | CHOI LIAM | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 26% | 5% | < 1% |
| 18 | MOROAICA Seiku | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
| 19 | ELSAYED Omar | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | LIU Nico | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 21 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | - | - | 7% | 29% | 45% | 20% | |
| 22 | LI Sky | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | YANG Aegon | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 24 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | CHOI Brayden Yui Chit | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | LVOVSKIY Roman | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 27 | LEI Isaac | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 28 | DESAI Arthav | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 29 | FAN Yuchen | 1% | 9% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | FU BRANDEN | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 46% | 13% |
| 31 | LIU Franklin | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | DING Orlando | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | LUO Gavin | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 34 | WOLLOW Bennett | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | CHUNG Evan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 36 | TABANCAY Cole | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 37 | WU Allen | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DENG Richard | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 39 | CAO Chuck | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | MALLARD Arthur | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | YUNG Nathan | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | CHEN Donovan | 1% | 10% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 43 | WU August | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | ZHANG Peter | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | HSIEH Maxwell | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 46 | ZHEN Felix | 3% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | JI Derek | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | RAMAKRISHNA Arjun | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | ATA Kevin | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 50 | LIU Jayden | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | RAMAKRISHNA Aditya | 17% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | FERRING Theo | 2% | 11% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | WONG Alexander | 3% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 54 | FAN Yuen | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 54 | KIM Connor | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ZHENG Matt | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | XIN Ryan | 22% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HADFIELD Gavin | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GUO ATTICUS | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 61 | GOURJI Roman | 61% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | NG Jaden | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | WU Aiden | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | MARSHALL Dylan | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | KIM Dylan | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 66 | WHITE Marcus | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | SEVERT David | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | WEI Jonathan | < 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 21% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.