AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GU Andrew 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
2 KHANNA Adamantis 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 71%
3 WONG Hawken 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
3 WANG Matthew 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 39%
5 LUC Linkin 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 49%
6 KANG Jeremy 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
7 CHEN Jack 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98%
8 ZEYU wu 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 74%
9 SRIVATSAV Ishaan 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 14%
10 YU Jayden 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 18%
11 CHAN Troy Devon 100% 100% 99% 87% 54% 15%
12 VO Blake 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47%
13 ROBINSON Ezra 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 34% 7%
14 LI Ryan 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 14%
15 TANG Morgan 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 29%
16 ZHANG Shaoxuan 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 15%
17 KIM Leo 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 1% < 1%
18 WONG Ron 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 16%
19 SOULES-ONO Makoa 100% 100% 97% 79% 38% 5%
20 GREENSTEIN Viktor 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 50%
21 GRIGORIEV Roman 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 35%
22 XIE Justin 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 6%
23 KOZLOFF Wyatt 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 49%
24 LEE Alexander 100% 98% 61% 18% 2% -
25 HE Zhikai (kyle) 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
26 HAN Kyle 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
27 SLOAN Ethan 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
28 CHEN Shawn 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
29 SUN Ryan 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 7%
30 HWANG Hagan 100% 100% 99% 96% 80% 47% 13%
31 LEE Winston 100% 100% 94% 69% 29% 5%
32 GATTO Enzo P. 100% 100% 95% 79% 47% 16% 2%
33 LUC Cedric 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 59%
34 FISCHER Noel 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 48% 9%
35 FU BRANDEN 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 40% 8%
36 ROH Jaden 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 15%
37 YPHANTIDES Alexander 100% 100% 99% 85% 48% 12%
38 LEE Kyle 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 4%
39 DESAI Arthav 100% 100% 94% 68% 26% 3%
40 KIM Enoch 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 16% 2%
41 QI Jeremy 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 10%
42 LEI Isaac 100% 94% 50% 13% 2% -
43 PI Edwin 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
44 RAMAKRISHNA Arjun 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% - -
45 STAMPER Wyatt 100% 99% 89% 60% 27% 6% 1%
46 MASAKI Alex 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 10% 1%
47 LOPEZ Mateo 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 16% 2%
48 WU Lucas 100% 99% 90% 54% 15% 1%
49 LO Elroy 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
50 AN Chris 100% 100% 97% 82% 44% 10% -
51 YUE Ivan 100% 99% 89% 59% 23% 4% -
52 YUEN Caleb 100% 100% 99% 85% 49% 13%
53 LIN Ethan 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
54 SRIVATSAV Anay 100% 100% 98% 82% 38% -
55 OU Rigel 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 23% 2%
56 VENKATRAMAN Sushil 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
56 PARK Emerson 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
58 FAN Yuchen 100% 98% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
59 ELSAYED Yahia 100% 100% 93% 65% 24% 4% -
60 LEE Jayden Junhyuk 100% 99% 91% 66% 30% 7% 1%
61 NGUYEN Ethan 100% 95% 68% 30% 7% 1%
62 CHANG William 100% 100% 95% 67% 27% 4%
63 KIM Derek 100% 96% 67% 26% 5% - -
64 LAMADRID Zachary 100% 68% 25% 5% - - -
65 KAMURA Kosei 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 4% < 1%
66 YANG Jake 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
67 SU Eric 100% 100% 92% 60% 16% -
67 LIU Paul 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 7% 1%
69 HRISTOV Nickolas 100% 100% 97% 73% 28% 3%
70 TONG Evan 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% -
71 XIE Jingwei 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
72 PARK Jayden 100% 98% 85% 53% 17% 2%
73 LVOVSKIY Roman 100% 99% 91% 63% 25% 4%
74 WANG Ryan 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 20% 3%
75 TENG Lucas 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 14% 1%
76 CHEN Zhengming 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1% -
77 HO Alden 100% 99% 89% 52% 13% 1%
78 LAI Mars 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 13% 1%
78 GU Dean 100% 95% 75% 42% 14% 2% -
80 MOROAICA Seiku 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 20% 2%
81 HIROTA Mitchell 100% 50% 13% 2% - - -
82 RAMBHIA Smit 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
83 WANG James 100% 99% 88% 57% 21% 3%
84 CAO Chuck 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
85 SMITH Etienne 100% 93% 69% 34% 10% 1% -
86 ZHANG Hanzhi 100% 96% 66% 25% 5% - -
87 WU Dawei 100% 100% 98% 85% 49% 13% 1%
88 CHOI LIAM 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 14% 2%
89 LUO Gavin 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 8% 1%
89 LEE Brendan 100% 100% 94% 74% 39% 11% 1%
92 ADAMS Jordan 100% 97% 73% 31% 6% - -
92 WU Allen 100% 84% 43% 11% 1% - -
94 LIU Clarence 100% 81% 43% 14% 2% - -
95 ELSAYED Omar 100% 100% 89% 59% 23% 5% -
96 MALLARD Arthur 100% 81% 34% 7% 1% - -
97 YANG Aegon 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1% -
98 DING Orlando 100% 99% 81% 43% 13% 2% -
99 DENG Richard 100% 99% 90% 57% 19% 2% -
100 HIROTA Jackson 100% 54% 10% 1% - -
101 CHEN Aaron 100% 97% 81% 50% 19% 4% -
102 BODO John 100% 96% 74% 38% 12% 2% -
104 WU Dustin 100% 74% 22% 3% - -
105 ERPELDING Ryan 100% 79% 34% 8% 1% -
106 XU Ethan 100% 67% 24% 5% - -
107 GOTTSCHALK Theodore 100% 94% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
108 BOSSOW Grant 100% 86% 41% 9% 1% - -
109 LIU Nico 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 1%
110 HUNG Jaden 100% 93% 68% 34% 10% 2% -
111 ZHANG Peter 100% 77% 30% 5% - -
112 JI Derek 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1% -
113 LIU Huberry 100% 95% 73% 38% 11% 2% -
114 ZHANG Connery 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
115 LI Sky 100% 91% 59% 21% 4% - -
116 MAHAPATRA Rohan 100% 100% 94% 69% 25% 3%
117 QI Zach 100% 99% 81% 37% 6% -
118 HSIEH Maxwell 100% 92% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
119 ARENA Carlo 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8% -
120 FERRING Theo 100% 99% 87% 57% 23% 5% -
121 CHEW Marcus 100% 53% 13% 1% - - -
122 EKAMBARAM Rithik 100% 96% 73% 34% 8% 1%
123 WONG Alexander 100% 92% 61% 23% 4% - -
124 RAMOS Pious 100% 55% 15% 2% - -
125 DUFF Michael 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 7% -
126 FAN Yuen 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
128 LITTLE Mica 100% 57% 15% 2% - - -
129 GUO ATTICUS 100% 67% 23% 4% - -
130 LUTZ Brandon 100% 77% 35% 9% 1% - -
130 HADFIELD Gavin 100% 35% 5% - - -
132 DOUGLAS Milo 100% 11% - - - - -
133 LOH Dylan 100% 52% 14% 2% - - -
134 NG Jaden 100% 38% 6% - - - -
135 PAVLENKOV Maxim 100% 53% 10% 1% - -
136 CHEN Yihan 100% 12% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.