Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TUMMINGS C.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 2 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 3 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 5 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 6 | CHENG Thomas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 7 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 9 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 10 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 23% | ||
| 11 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | ||
| 13 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 14 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 16 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | 100% | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 22 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | WU Jerry | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 25 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 26 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | |
| 28 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 29 | WEI William | 100% | 89% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 31 | AHN Jun | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 19% | |
| 35 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 35 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | BING Charles | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 9% | ||
| 39 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 87% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 42 | ANTONIO Marcky C. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 44 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | WANG JONATHAN | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | ||
| 48 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 78% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | MOCCO Jared | 100% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LIN Joseph | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 88% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | BRODERICK Padraig | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
| 56 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 58 | GUO Sean | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 59 | TOMRUK Batu | 100% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.