Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 2 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 3 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 33% |
| 5 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 6 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 7 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 8 | DENG Destin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
| 9 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 10 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 12 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% |
| 14 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 16 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
| 17 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 13% | |
| 18 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 19 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | |
| 20 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 21 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 22 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 24 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 25 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 26 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 27 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MAI Sy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
| 31 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
| 32 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | ONG David | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 5% | |
| 36 | CHAN JR Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 37 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | BEN-YOSEPH Rafael | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 41 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 42 | CROY Felix | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | LU Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
| 45 | HAN Alex | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KONG William | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 49 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 50 | LAU Caleb | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 51 | YU Brandon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 52 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 55 | LEE Leo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 56 | JU Shang | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 58 | SZETO Zachary | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | HUANG Eason | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | KOU Mason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 63 | LI Connor | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 64 | ZHANG Jenson | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | YOO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 66 | YUN Mason | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | NG Alexander | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 70 | AKKARA Skyler | 100% | 77% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | LI Vance | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | CHI Zachary | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | YIM Antonio | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 75 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | LIU William | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | CHIEN Ian | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 78 | FONG Ethan | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 79 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 81 | KIM Hayden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 83 | BROWN Sean | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | YOON Ian | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | PARK Sean | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 87 | JI Dylan | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | BALDWIN Liam | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | LU Mark | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.