San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DUONG Enoch | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | D V V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | AU Marcus J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | LIU Felix | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | COLLINS Damase | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 10 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | SIVAGAR Leo | D V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | LIU Kirk D. | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | KATZ Matheo | V D V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 14 | GARRETT Samuel | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | WRIGHT Christopher | D D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | STENNIS Brendan | D D D D V | V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 17 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | V V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 19 | PARK Elliot | V V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | KENNY Oliver R. | V V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | HUSSAIN Kamran | D V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | MILEY Nick N. | V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | WEAVER Neil | V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | BAGCHI Aritra | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | V V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | LIU Andrew | D D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | ZHANG Alec | V D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | KUO Elvin | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | LAU Matthew | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | BRINEN-STOUT Jared P. | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | MING Nathan | D D D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 32 | BHARGAV Siddharth | D V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 33 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | HASAN Raamis | V D D D D D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 | |
| 36 | FINE Gabriel C. | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | YALAMANCHALI Pranay | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 38 | MALEEV Georgy | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | QUIROGA Kyle | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 40 | AYER Ishaan | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.