October NAC

Cadet Men's Foil

Monday, October 21, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHEN James P. - - - - 2% 25% 73%
2 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. - - - 1% 8% 35% 57%
3 YU Eric W. - - - 1% 12% 41% 45%
3 KELLY William J. - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15%
5 EMMER Chase T. - - - - 4% 29% 67%
6 PRILUTSKY David B. - - - 4% 19% 43% 33%
7 TULYAG Fyze A. - - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
8 LIU Justin - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
9 YU Vinni - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 21%
10 HAMILTON Bogdan A. - - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
11 BESSIRE Nolan S. - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
12 CHUNG Andrew N. - - - - 5% 31% 64%
13 AYUPOV Ilya - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
14 OURSLER Jack - 1% 7% 30% 45% 17%
15 LIU Niles J. - - 1% 5% 20% 41% 33%
16 LI Jiaan - 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 1%
17 LI Brandon H. - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
18 DESERANNO Jeidus - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
19 DICKSON Farr R. - - 1% 13% 43% 42%
19 XIAO Ethan J. - - 1% 12% 41% 46%
21 NAGIMOV Marsel - - 3% 17% 41% 39%
22 ZUSIN Zachary W. - - - 4% 21% 42% 32%
23 SHIH William - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
24 CHEN Ziyuan - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
25 REALS Alden D. - - 5% 23% 39% 27% 6%
26 VOGLER Justin K. - - 1% 7% 27% 45% 21%
27 XIAO Enoch A. - - 2% 13% 35% 38% 12%
28 KO Brian J. - - 1% 9% 27% 41% 21%
29 GRANT Lachlan K. - 4% 21% 44% 27% 5%
30 SCHENCK Koen M. 2% 20% 38% 29% 10% 1%
31 XIAO Leon (Ruibo) - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 16%
32 ANDERSON Colton J. 1% 8% 30% 38% 19% 4% -
33 ZHANG Daniel D. - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
34 GRIFFIN John O. - - - 3% 16% 41% 39%
35 LEE Caden - 2% 10% 27% 35% 22% 5%
36 WU Alexander - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 7%
37 LI Simon A. - 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
38 SULLIVAN Jackson R. - - - 5% 30% 53% 10%
39 WU Michael - 5% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
40 OH Samuel H. 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
41 KUMBLA Samarth 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
42 KIM Nicholas W. - 3% 13% 33% 36% 15%
42 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. - 3% 16% 35% 34% 12%
44 ZENG Lucas H. - - 3% 14% 35% 38% 10%
45 ZHANG Luke T. 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7% 1%
46 OTAKE Jared K. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
47 CHEN Allen 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7% 1%
47 HUTH Mitchell - 2% 15% 36% 33% 13% 2%
49 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. - 1% 6% 23% 40% 27% 4%
50 MITCHELL Philip D. - 2% 23% 41% 27% 7% -
50 JANG Jaewon - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 6%
52 CHEN Andrew - 9% 29% 35% 20% 5% 1%
53 HOOSHI Jayden C. - 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
54 STANLEY Mason B. 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
55 LI Raphael C. 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
56 ZHANG Nicholas Z. - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
57 UM Ethan A. - 1% 6% 20% 36% 30% 8%
58 WONG Adam L. - - 6% 25% 39% 25% 5%
59 NGUYEN Nish - 8% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
60 TSANG Matthew K. - 1% 16% 39% 33% 10% 1%
61 BAE Kevin 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 6% 1%
62 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 1% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
63 HONG Daniel - 1% 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
64 GRIFFITH JACK 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
65 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
66 LIN Richard W. - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 3%
67 MA Alexander - - 2% 15% 38% 36% 9%
68 CHOI Ethan L. - - 3% 15% 35% 36% 12%
69 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. - - 4% 20% 41% 29% 6%
70 MCCLAIN Bryce C. - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
71 HOOSHI Dylan M. - 1% 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
72 WU Nicholas 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
73 LIANG Lixi (Henry) - 1% 11% 35% 41% 12%
74 CHENG Thomas C. - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9%
75 GIRALDO Pablo E. - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
76 PARK Luke J. - 1% 10% 29% 40% 20%
77 PELOSKY Ryan F. - 1% 5% 22% 42% 30%
78 LEVY Jacob M. - 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
79 CANNON Caiden C. - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
80 WAN Jason - 6% 23% 35% 26% 8% 1%
81 ZHENG Alan H. - 1% 14% 38% 35% 12% 1%
82 LIN Dashiell 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
83 RINEHART Conner M. 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
84 FU Samuel Y. 1% 9% 26% 36% 22% 5% -
85 KASI Sanjay - 4% 17% 35% 31% 12% 1%
86 ONIK Elijah T. - 2% 14% 35% 35% 13% 1%
87 GRISWOLD Abel B. 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
88 MARTINEZ Donavyn E. - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
89 DANKAR Neel 3% 21% 37% 27% 10% 2% -
90 WESTELIUS Isak R. - 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
91 PYO Michael M. 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
92 LI Richard - 5% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1%
93 CHAN Tyler 10% 31% 36% 19% 5% -
94 JEON Caleb A. 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
95 KOBAL Maximilian 1% 20% 42% 29% 8% 1%
96 YEROKHIN Michael N. - 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% -
97 CHIN Jason Y. 1% 8% 25% 34% 24% 8% 1%
98 SHIKHMAN Robert 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
98 HSIUNG Richie 24% 40% 26% 8% 1% - -
100 BAE Junnie - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
101 DAVIS Christopher M. 5% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
102 YI Stephen K. 1% 13% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
103 KIM Tei D. - 1% 7% 29% 47% 16% 1%
104 TSAY Jeremy M. - 5% 27% 39% 23% 6% 1%
104 UPTON Craig 44% 42% 13% 2% - - -
106 UPTON Michael 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
107 BANERJEE ANUP - 3% 16% 36% 33% 11% 1%
108 MILLER Duncan R. 2% 17% 39% 32% 8% 1% -
109 DROUTMAN Ryan - 5% 28% 39% 23% 5% -
110 KIM Isaiah G. 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% -
110 CHIN Julian S. 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3%
112 WU Jerry 9% 29% 36% 21% 5% 1%
113 BREIER Matthew F. 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
114 COSTELLO Chaissen F. - 7% 29% 41% 20% 3%
114 CHENG Jonathan - 7% 25% 38% 24% 6%
116 QIAN Michael 2% 15% 38% 34% 10% 1% -
117 CHOUN Samuel Minwook - 1% 5% 19% 37% 32% 6%
117 LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 6%
119 GATZA Logan 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
119 ZHANG Henry C. - 1% 12% 31% 36% 17% 3%
119 PAEK Alex J. - - 4% 20% 41% 31% 5%
119 FUKUDA Alessio R. - 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
123 NUNNINK Phillip W. 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
124 KIM Aaron J. 1% 14% 37% 34% 12% 2% -
125 CHENG Matthew S. 11% 31% 35% 18% 5% 1% -
125 PIESNER Joshua C. 39% 40% 17% 4% - - -
127 WHITE-ROY Nolan 4% 31% 42% 19% 3% -
128 LAURICELLA Douglas - 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% -
129 DARIANO Noah G. 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
130 SONG Dylan S. 1% 13% 39% 34% 12% 2% -
131 LEE Connor C. 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
132 SONG Aiden S. 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
133 CAI Jason Zhicheng 15% 36% 33% 14% 3% -
134 YU Anders 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 2%
135 LE Vyn A. 10% 36% 39% 13% 2% -
136 KIM Brandon J. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 1%
137 FUKUDA Renzo K. - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 3%
138 DESHMUKH Ayush 4% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
138 KIM BANSEOK 29% 49% 19% 3% - - -
140 PRASANNA Advaith 7% 68% 23% 3% - - -
141 DOCTOR Aidan L. 1% 7% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
142 LIM Ari - 3% 18% 34% 31% 13% 2%
143 ROUNTREE Rob 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% 1% -
144 GLOVER James 10% 45% 34% 10% 1% - -
145 SELIVANOV Adam 42% 41% 15% 2% - - -
146 KAZA Nitish 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2% -
147 MURUHIN Yaroslav 7% 32% 39% 18% 4% - -
148 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 3% 28% 42% 22% 5% - -
149 NEWHARD Noah A. 13% 37% 34% 13% 2% -
150 XIAO Anthony 8% 29% 36% 21% 5% -
151 PHAM-CHANG Duke A. 32% 45% 20% 3% - -
152 MAO Connor 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 10% 1%
153 KIM Derek A. 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
154 SANTULLI Tristan 12% 56% 27% 5% - - -
155 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 36% 45% 16% 2% - - -
156 OAKLAND Brennan D. 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
157 HO Ryan J. - 3% 20% 38% 29% 8% 1%
158 GILLIAM Jason E. 17% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
159 MURRAY Maximo 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
159 PIERCE Logan 77% 21% 2% - - - -
161 FORTUNE Alexander J. 13% 41% 35% 10% 1% - -
162 SWEENEY Quinn 38% 46% 14% 2% - - -
162 HOBSON Aaron K. 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
164 AVRON Case B. 7% 40% 37% 14% 2% - -
165 DIERKS Kian 1% 13% 36% 35% 13% 2% -
166 LANG Dong Lin 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
167 WERWA Griffith 12% 59% 25% 4% - - -
168 LEE Chris 3% 19% 35% 28% 12% 2% -
169 RIOS Ethan 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
170 FREEDMAN Samuel E. 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
171 MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. 15% 41% 34% 9% 1% -
172 KITAGAWA Eric S. 25% 47% 23% 4% - - -
172 FLYNN Ian 16% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
174 WONG NICHOLAS A. 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
175 ARANA Massimo 78% 20% 2% - - -
176 CHIRASHNYA Adam 7% 31% 37% 19% 5% - -
177 CHOI Samuel 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
178 GAO William 72% 24% 3% - - -
179 HAN Andersen Y. 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
180 LI Ryan Z. 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
181 SANTOS Carlos R. 68% 28% 4% - - - -
181 KUO Evan 52% 37% 10% 1% - - -
183 BARTEL Jacob L. 31% 43% 21% 5% - -
184 GALLUCCI Charles John 9% 29% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
185 CHIN Ryan 94% 6% - - - - -
186 BOUSSY Luciano 68% 29% 3% - - - -
187 BERNHARDT Hank 90% 10% - - - - -
188 TANG Adrian 74% 25% 2% - - - -
188 GNEUHS Sam 75% 23% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.