Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | DANIS Blake M. | D D V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | CELECKI Barrett | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | MCADOO Declan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | LEE Seungwon | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 6 | MUENKE Magnus | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 7 | SOKOLOVAS Genadijus | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 8 | BRUNO Timothy | V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | MARENCIK Miles | V V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 6 | +4.0 |
| 10 | AGGELER Donovan | V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | WEBER Nora | D V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 12 | STRAUSS Luke | V V D V V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 13 | DARRICAU OLY Henri J. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | VASHRO Layne | V D D D V V | V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 15 | INGHILTERRA Luca | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 16 | ZHU Riley | V D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 17 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | GRODITSKI Alexander | V V V D V D | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 19 | ISAACSON Calev | D V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | MARTEGANI Enea | D D V V V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | BURKS Madison | D V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | GADBURY Logan | D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 23 | PASOS RIVAS Edgar Gerardo | D V D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 24 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | SCHWITZER Eliot | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | LIU Josh | V D V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 27 | HERMANDEZ Fernando | D V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 28 | LEWIS Madeline | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | MCKILLOP Matthew | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | EMERSON Zachary | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | CONTOS Nicole | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | COLE Matthew | D D D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 33 | FREEMAN Katherine | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | D V D D D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 35 | ISAACSON Henny | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | KISSINGFORD John F. | D D D D V | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 37 | VORONINA Kseniya | V D D D D D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 | |
| 38 | BRADSHAW Tyler | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 39 | STOY Patrick | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.