Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 2 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 3 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | LOPATIN Sergei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 5 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
| 6 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | CASH William Li | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 8 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 9 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 10 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 11 | KUBBA Sauvil | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 12 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 13 | YU Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | |
| 14 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 13% |
| 15 | ZHUKOV Egor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 16 | HUDSON Declan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | ||
| 18 | GUO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 20 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% | |
| 21 | WEI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% | - |
| 22 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 23 | CHOI Joshua | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | URIA Sullivan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | ||
| 25 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | ||
| 26 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHONG Eden | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | SAAD Peter | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | CHUNG Daehyun Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 30 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 32 | SCORDINSKY Liam | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 15% | ||
| 33 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 34 | GALIOTE James | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 35 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | KIM Siwoo | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | SMOTHERS Eli | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | SHAO Mason | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | QI Bryan | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | ||
| 41 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WANG Henry | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | FEELY Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | WANG William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | MAXWELL Taiga | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SHULL Matthias | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | CHIU Preston | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 49 | KELLY Blair | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 50 | CARL-YODER Matthew | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 52 | HAVARUSHKA Bahdan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | QU ethan | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | SERGEANT Henry | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | MORET Declan | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | SMITH Noah | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | HEALY Caden | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | ATTALLA Taha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.