Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | CHEN Tianjun | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | BRESLAV Asher | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | TANG Luke | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 5 | MANSFIELD Hunter | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | ROFINO Samuel | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | BURDICK Elijah | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | ZHENG Jason | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | CHEN Cameron | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | LEE Elijah | D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | HOLBROOK Silas | V V D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 15 | LI Tyrese | D V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | FLANNICK Cole | D D V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 17 | LEE Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 18 | GILLARD Adan | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | CHO Adrian | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Gavin | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | ASHLEY Logan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 22 | KABA Elias | V D V D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 22 | LIN Lucas | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | CHEN Hayden | D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | LAKSHMAN Vishnu | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | LIU Easun | V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 27 | LEE Harrison | V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | LI Jayden | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | ZHU Brady | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 30 | MA Joseph | D V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | RICHARDSON Matthew | V D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 32 | PRUSHIK-LADIN Dan | V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | ROBINSON Blake | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 34 | CIANCHETTA David | V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | CHEN Daniel | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 36 | REZENDE Lucas | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 38 | GREGORY Milo | D V V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 39 | MANUEL Eli | V D V D V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 40 | BRATU Max | D D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 41 | RICK Dylan | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | AN Remi | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 43 | YOON Jonathan | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 44 | NOVAK Luke | D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 45 | JEONG Joseph | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 46 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 47 | ACHILOV Murod | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 48 | LI Jayden | V D V D D D | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 49 | GUO zhaohong | V V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 50 | CHANG Connor | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 51 | LIU George | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 52 | RUDIGER George | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 53 | KESELMAN Ron | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 54 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 55 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 56 | SULLIVAN Dennis | D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 57 | MILOWSKY Majai | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 58 | YONG Connor | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 59 | ECCLESTONE Liam | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 60 | MATHEW Benjamin | D D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 61 | YADAV Aarav | D D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 62 | ZHANG Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 63 | SON Joshua | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 64 | LANDMAN Martin | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 65 | YU MAXIMILIAN | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 65 | LI Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 67 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 67 | NAGELHOUT Cole | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.