Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SZCZAPA Lukas | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 2 | CHEN Tianjun | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | BRESLAV Asher | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 3 | TANG Luke | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 5 | MANSFIELD Hunter | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
| 6 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
| 7 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 8 | ROFINO Samuel | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 9 | BURDICK Elijah | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | ZHENG Jason | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 11 | CHEN Cameron | - | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 12 | LEE Elijah | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% | |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 14 | HOLBROOK Silas | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | LI Tyrese | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | FLANNICK Cole | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEE Ryan | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 18 | GILLARD Adan | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 19 | CHO Adrian | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | ASHLEY Logan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | KABA Elias | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 22 | LIN Lucas | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 24 | CHEN Hayden | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 25 | LAKSHMAN Vishnu | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 26 | LIU Easun | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | LEE Harrison | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
| 28 | LI Jayden | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 29 | ZHU Brady | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 30 | MA Joseph | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 31 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | PRUSHIK-LADIN Dan | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | ROBINSON Blake | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 34 | CIANCHETTA David | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | CHEN Daniel | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% | |
| 36 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 36 | REZENDE Lucas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 38 | GREGORY Milo | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | MANUEL Eli | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 40 | BRATU Max | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | RICK Dylan | 8% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | AN Remi | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 43 | YOON Jonathan | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | NOVAK Luke | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | JEONG Joseph | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | ACHILOV Murod | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | LI Jayden | - | - | 1% | 15% | 46% | 33% | 5% |
| 49 | GUO zhaohong | 12% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | CHANG Connor | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 51 | LIU George | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 52 | RUDIGER George | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 53 | KESELMAN Ron | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | ZHENG Yicheng Will | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 55 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 56 | SULLIVAN Dennis | - | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
| 57 | MILOWSKY Majai | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | YONG Connor | 3% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | ECCLESTONE Liam | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | MATHEW Benjamin | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | YADAV Aarav | 8% | 41% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Jacob | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | SON Joshua | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | LANDMAN Martin | 29% | 42% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 65 | LI Alexander | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | NAGELHOUT Cole | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.